dozla:

imoooo its so stupit that the same ppl who complain abt the incest in genealogy which is, yknow, treated as taboo and terrible.  are like “uwu my azurrin babies” and try to justify it by saying it doesnt count as incest bc it was a plot twist. like no. you’re just a hypocrite and don’t like games with good writing. genealogy has flaws, its a 20some year old game, but fates was poorly written and fanservicey and catered to incest fetishists lol and suckers like you still try to defend the plot as anything other than a cash grab off awakening’s success. lolz.

While I agree that there’s a lot of unnecessary hostilities between the different subsections of fandom and that criticisms of the games can be made in bad faith from preexisting biases against those groups (i.e. that Awakening and Fates represent newbies/casuals or that Genealogy, Blazing Sword, and/or the Tellius games are the ones most often exalted by older fans/elitists), the idea that Genealogy has a morally stronger position against incest than Fates or any other game for that matter is fundamentally flawed.

Sure, Arvis/Deirdre is explicitly a plot of the main antagonist…but of the numerous instances of unambiguous incestuous feeling in the Jugdral games this the only one condemned by the text, and arguably it’s more because Manfroy kidnapped and brainwashed Deirdre to make it happen than because he set her up to marry and sleep with her half-brother. The children of this pairing are practically demigods, and for Julius at least it is acknowledged in-game to be so because he is the product of incest. Then there’s Lachesis, whose powerful attachment to her brother is presented as a star-crossed love that can potentially get “fulfilled” if the player chooses to pair up Lachesis’s daughter and Eldigan’s son, who are fully aware of their parents’ unconventional attraction and lean into the implication in one of their conversations. That’s not even touching upon the other instances of potential incest the game allows for, among them an uncle and niece (Shannan/Larcei), two pairs of first cousins who could also be considered genetic half-siblings as their mothers are identical twins (Lester/Patty and Febail/Lana), two Gen 1 pairs ambiguously related through common holy blood (Ayra/Chulainn and Claud/Silvia), and possibly others depending in Gen 2 depending on who gets paired up in Gen 1 (ex. Lex!Larcei with Iuchar or Iucharba is another set of first cousins). The game does nothing to discourage any of these and could even be said to support these potential pairings as all of them have lover conversations, something that quite a few pairings in this game lack. 

Overall I would say that FE4 takes a morally neutral stance against consensual incest, something that could be said for Fire Emblem as a whole and that crops up in smaller concentrations in most games. Fates may have a host of writing problems – I’m going over them again myself in a series I’m working through at the moment – but its stance on incest is entirely consistent with the rest of the series, from Lachesis’s tragic love to Priscilla’s clingy attachment to Raven to the twincest rumors of FE8 (freshly rekindled by Heroes, incidentally) to the bara bandit brothers in Awakening especially to, yes, Corrin’s ability to bone a whole host of people who are their siblings after a fashion. On that note though I do have to remark that Azurrin is not where you’ll find FE14′s incest fetishism. They’re only cousins – not considered incestuous in many cultures, including in Japan apparently since both Awakening and Fates include cousin pairings that are romantic in Japanese but clumsily censored to be platonic in localization – and are only revealed as such near the very end of what will probably be the last route the player experiences. It’s not something the story or their support dwell on either. No, the real incest fetishism comes from pairing Corrin with any of the Hoshidan or Nohrian royals, each of which plays up that angle for the benefit of those who are into that sort of thing.

And, for my part, I don’t consider that a problem. I’ve engaged in incest roleplay in my own sex life, and I don’t see anything morally objectionable about exploring the subject in fiction either. For better or worse incest is a recurring motif (or running gag, if you will) of Fire Emblem, and while we can speculate endlessly as to just why the series repeatedly feels the urge to go there it is something that fans either have to square with and accept or attempt to ignore. The individual games can be freely picked apart for their ethical and representational missteps – and old and new alike they all misstep in their own ways – but I would be very much surprised if there were ever an FE that took an all-around definitive stance against incest. Would it even really be FE then?

What is the most overrated FE4 ship, in your opinion?

Hard to say since I’ve had no direct exposure to the Japanese fandom and the Western one for this game is minuscule. Lewyn/Erinys is the easiest pairing to make mechanically, was made canon in FE5, and makes a godly Ced (Forseti!Arthur is arguably better, but I’m not really a fan of Pursuit-less Tailtiu kids), but that’s not so much the fandom as the game itself clearly favoring it. Finn/Lachesis bugs me in the sense that I still don’t understand why it’s as popular as it is, enough to spark a massive ship war. That’s about all I’ve got for this game, really.

Did you hear? Some guy named Lorerunner did a video about FE4.

deetvar:

It’s massive long video but worth the watch. 

Nice analysis, and interesting to hear from someone with a very different level of experience with FE as a whole compared to many of us active or semi-active in the fandom. There’s very little about Leonster and Quan and Leif aren’t even mentioned for example, but on the flip side some of his points re: Manfroy and Loptyr I’d never really thought about at all.

o/ Azel

You also asked for Ranulf, so I’ll do both here.

Ranulf

Sexuality Headcanon:

Bi with a preference for men and masculine-presenting people generally, hence why he’s got a camaraderie with Lethe but has no patience for either Lyre or Kyza – and the paired ending with Ike, of course.

Gender Headcanon:

Cis male, but I can see him being more genderfluid in the bedroom if his partner’s into it.

A ship I have with said character:

Ike/Ranulf. Ranulf/Skrimir could technically work as well, but there’s less to build off.

A BROTP I have with said character:

Skrimir if they’re not having wild cat sex, Giffca, Lethe, Amy (Calill and Largo’s daughter)

A NOTP I have with said character:

Ranulf/Lyre. At least if he’s with Kyza the sex can be hilariously awkward.

A random headcanon:

Very few people get to see him without his distinctive hat. It throws everyone (Ike definitely included) off when they see him bare-headed for the first time.

General opinion over said character:

A fun guy with some memorable lines and a decent amount of story presence across both games, which is more than many Tellius characters can claim. He’s also average to above average as a unit in both, especially surprising given how annoying non-royal laguz gauges can be. I like his rapport with Ike, and I like that their paired ending offers an alternative to Ike/Soren that can be just as if not more enjoyable to read fic for. 

Also the porn is unquestionably hotter – cat boy!

Azelle

Sexuality Headcanon:

Mostly straight, but he and Lex are really close *nudge nudge wink wink*

Gender Headcanon:

Has to be cis male so the breeding mechanics make sense, but then I’m not an expert on trans headcanons so I’m sure someone could figure something out given the motivation to do so.

A ship I have with said character:

Lex/Azelle is proto-Hector/Eliwood so I like it, and hopefully their dynamic will be even more endearing and messy (per their current circumstances) in a remake. Azelle/Tailtiu for marriage purposes and also for my preferred breeding setup.

A BROTP I have with said character:

Lex of course. Maybe Sigurd? His relationship with Arvis is a…peculiar subject.

A NOTP I have with said character:

Not a fan of Azelle/Edain because one Midir is enough, thank you very much. I also never do LTC runs, so using Rescue to speed through Chapters 4 and 5 isn’t worth totally screwing over Lester.

A random headcanon:

I can’t see Arvis letting him die at Belhalla, but the ensuing familial situation with the Velthomers could not possibly have been pretty. Especially if Hilda was involved somehow…how is she related to them anyway?

General opinion over said character:

Not very fun to use as a unit because it’s Horse Emblem and fire magic is terrible, but he’s a strong father for some of the kids. I do prefer Eliwood and his dynamic with his intimately close blue-haired BFF, but Azelle’s got his entertaining moments. I like how the two of them and Tailtiu all get to express their conflicted feelings over fighting their families, and how they all approach the prospect differently.

Sigurd/Deirdre

So very bland, even Marth/Caeda has a more interesting dynamic despite Archanea’s limitations in the characterization department. I get the instant attraction from Deirdre’s end – he’s rich, dumb, and hot if you live in a world where blue hair is normal that is – but I’m not sold on the pairing as an epic love for the ages. Maybe they’ll get a boost from a remake?

On Quan/Finn

markoftheasphodel:

gascon-en-exil:

I’ve already made it clear that I’d like to see this pairing elevated to canon status in the Jugdral remakes, and unless IS decides not to pull from Heroes at all and go in a completely unexpected direction with Finn I think it’s safe to say we’re going to get some heavily implied subtext at the very least on his end. It’d be both good storytelling to play around with popular fandom impressions of the character (most of them involving het ships) and good representation insofar as Finn is a wholly different sort of character from the likes of Leon and Heather. It would also be relatively easy to work his love for Quan into his actions in FE5 and Gen 2 and so not restrict his sexuality to his backstory. Good deal all around…provided it’s reciprocal, of course.

Keep reading

Well seeing this was an unexpected treat.

Keep reading

Apparently spewing out several paragraphs every few months with no warning is just how I do Jugdral meta/headcanons.

Mmm, but there are quite a few things in FE canon that are also more “epic” than believable. FE’s latter-day concept of “devotion” also seems a bit… inherently bad, given the exemplars of the butler guy in FE14 and the village girl in FE15 (you know which ones). IDK, I’m the person who has a stumbling block in taking Sephiran seriously because of the centuries-spanning breadth of his grief, so…

Minor point about Lehran/Sephiran, but he only snapped and turned omnicidal chessmaster villain after the Serenes Massacre, twenty years before the events of FE9. Before that he was grieving over the loss of his powers and his enforced isolation and observing critically the constant tension between beorcs and laguz, but he wasn’t out to kill everyone yet. Twenty years is about the same length of time Finn devoted everything to Cuan, but it must have been much less to someone who’d lived for over a millennium. I can buy that. How he got himself a noble title in Begnion and became a senator despite seemingly coming from nowhere on the other hand….

As for the various overly devoted/obsessive 3DS characters, the difference between them and a hypothetical remake Finn is that their behavior often gets played for laughs. I have a hard time imagining the writers taking everything Finn goes through in both games and using it for comedy. Yes, it’s obvious that he’s got some unresolved issues he’s not working through in a healthy way even in the original games, but what he is doing is helping secure a throne for Leif and contributing to Seliph’s war effort in a major way. Regardless of how tragic his circumstances are (because some of the 3DS characters may also be potentially sympathetic in their OTT devotion) I think his plot importance would keep him out of the comic relief camp.

Insert salt that “Titania loved Greil” is automatically accepted as character motivation ‘cause it’s het. No close readings or manifesto required.

The irony is that I’ve barely ever given the Titania -> Greil dynamic a second thought specifically because it’s het in the very queer Tellius, but that’s a great parallel. I wonder if Radiant Dawn had had more time to spend on character work if we’d have gotten any more on that point. Surely she’d have something to say about Ike receiving his father’s axe at least (especially since she can wield said axe).

Back to Finn though, it occurred to me later that excessive grief over Quan would actually give him and Lachesis some common ground, though not of a kind that would likely lead to the creation of Nanna. I question how comfortable he’d be with talking about his feelings for Quan – and I doubt the remakes will clarify much on that score, since the localizations if not the Japanese originals of contemporary FE like to skirt around the subject of homophobia – but regardless of how he frames his grief it might create a situation that looks from the outside to be that of an emotionally fraught but cold couple. I still think something else had to have been happening with Glade for Selphina to take so much issue with Finn and Lachesis’s relationship, but that a whole other story.

On Quan/Finn

I’ve already made it clear that I’d like to see this pairing elevated to canon status in the Jugdral remakes, and unless IS decides not to pull from Heroes at all and go in a completely unexpected direction with Finn I think it’s safe to say we’re going to get some heavily implied subtext at the very least on his end. It’d be both good storytelling to play around with popular fandom impressions of the character (most of them involving het ships) and good representation insofar as Finn is a wholly different sort of character from the likes of Leon and Heather. It would also be relatively easy to work his love for Quan into his actions in FE5 and Gen 2 and so not restrict his sexuality to his backstory. Good deal all around…provided it’s reciprocal, of course.

While there may be a small amount of narrative appeal in keeping the relationship between Quan and Finn intimate but not sexual – making it both an idealized platonic erastes/eromenos dynamic and a gay take on courtly love – I imagine I’m not the only person who would be side-eyeing that reading. Per canon in the original games and as reinforced by Heroes, Finn dedicates almost two full decades of constant hardship and turmoil to fulfilling the dream of his deceased lord while also raising his lord’s son to become a suitable king for a unified Thracia. That’s an absurd amount of self-sacrifice in any scenario, and values of knighthood or not – and remember that one of the themes of FE5 is that knighthood is not all it’s cracked up to be – it’s nearly unbelievable if we’re to assume that he was only able to love an oblivious Quan from a distance. Far better would be the reading that when Finn is polishing the brave lance he’s wistfully recalling long nights of passion in Verdane and Agustria – that, unlike Lukas with Clive or Levail with Zelgius, his lord was willing to give him exactly what he wanted.

But what did Quan want?

I think it’s generally accepted in a tongue-in-cheek way by Tumblr’s FE community that the Gen 1 lord trio engaged in some youthful dalliances when they were at school together. Quan being the only one of the three with a young male retainer not related to him with whom he shares several conversations already encourages the observation that he was the one most invested in the physical particulars of those dalliances if nothing else. And then you look at that retainer and note that he has a certain physical resemblance to one of Quan’s friends (exacerbated by recent artwork that gives Finn more elaborate and…lordly outfits) as well as possibly a resemblance to that same friend’s naïveté on account of his age. And then you remember that Quan is married to that friend’s sister and the pieces fall into place a bit.

This is not to downplay the role of either Quan’s friendships or his grandiose political ambitions that rival (sometimes literally) some of Jugdral’s biggest antagonists in his connections with Sigurd and Eldigan, nor does it preclude the likelihood that he harbors genuine romantic and sexual attraction for Ethlyn and possibly also Finn. There are a number of ways to explain away these particular choices – Grannvale is closer and therefore more politically advantageous than Agustria, Ethlyn was clearly more mature and ready for the marriage market than Lachesis was prior to the events of the game, Quan and Eldigan may have not actually been as close (do they even talk in-game?) without the big dumb heart of the group to unite them, etc. – but it’s hard to look at Quan’s situation up until just before Yied and conclude that all of his desires conveniently lined up in such a way that he had basically everything. If he was working out an unrequited attraction to Sigurd through a loving wife and an adoring protégé while also furthering his plans for putting Leonster on the continental map it just makes him extremely fortunate – up until when his luck ran out in a very big way.

I think Ethlyn would have picked up on something between Quan and her brother, just as surely as she couldn’t have been blind to what he was doing with Finn. Finn on the other hand may not have figured it out, which is probably for the best. It’s enough that Finn would have known that he was sharing Quan’s affections with Ethlyn; adding a crush on Sigurd into the mix with the conclusion that their relationship may have begun as a kind of projection might have been too much. Quan seems to have been very much the love of Finn’s life, but even if they were intimately involved the reverse was definitely not true. Maybe the writers will lean into the messier side of desire between men already implied in FE5 with Selphina, and we’ll see a Gen 2 Finn who doesn’t hate Ethlyn but who also doesn’t have a problem with quietly omitting her legacy. Little things, like his first tears in over a decade during his reunion with Altena or Leif identifying himself as the son of one holy blood house in Heroes, add up to in my opinion and at only a bit of a stretch a Finn who sees Quan’s children as somehow theirs, that they are the legacy of his doomed love just as much as they are the future of Quan’s dreams for Thracia. Jugdral just rolls that way sometimes, so I can see it happening.

(Incidentally, this means that I’m now torn between the image of Finn as a responsible gay mentor for Diarmuid+any other non-straight Gen 2 characters and Finn as a subtly unhinged cautionary tale that fills them with dread for their own long term prospects.)

Sigurd/Arvis

  • When I started shipping it if I did:

Never have, don’t think I ever will. I’ve never actively shipped either of these characters with anyone, really.

  • My thoughts:

I don’t think I’ve ever even considered this ship until I read this ask. Of course they have their friendship abruptly turned antagonism with bonus (sort of) cuckoldry, but I have trouble thinking of either of them in a sexual context because they both have other things going on and are so very strange about the partners they do have.

  • What makes me happy about them:

Unlike many hate sex M/M pairings with a mutual female love interest, there’s never a point where they’re fighting over Deirdre per se, at least not in anything resembling a typical love triangle. That’s unique.

  • What makes me sad about them:

Sigurd’s Deirdre-sexuality never gets to make the logical (though still thoroughly absurd) connection with Arvis’s Oedipus complex where they’re banging through mutual unconscious attraction to both Deirdre and Cigyn. 

  • Things done in fanfic that annoys me:

Has anyone ever written this? No doubt I’ll get linked to something soon enough to prove me wrong.

  • Things I look for in fanfic:

For its existence?

  • Who I’d be comfortable them ending up with, if not each other:

I’m fine with their canon relationships (such as they are), though I’m with several others in having a tough time imagining how Arvis’s fling with Aida went down.

  • My happily ever after for them:

Barbecuing together.

  • who is the big spoon/little spoon:

Sigurd would probably be the big spoon since he’s the less bishonen of the two, but Arvis would unquestionably be both more proficient and more forceful in bed.

  • what is their favorite non-sexual activity:

Aside from the aforementioned barbecuing, the sharing of large shiny phallic objects. In a totally non-sexual way.

It’s amazing what a game you don’t even play can do for your perceptions of certain characters, because now thanks to Heroes I’m fairly solidly invested in gay!Finn. As it concerns the remakes:

Best case scenario – Quan/Finn is canon while not invalidating Quan/Ethlin, and is presented as a mutual lover/beloved relationship that couldn’t be all that squicky even for the most puritanical slashers since I’m reasonably certain that there’s a smaller age gap there than there is between Leon and Valbar. Finn is removed from the breeding pool entirely, sacrificing a so-so Pursuit father with a likely nerfed Miracle and an awkward weapon inheritance situation for the sake of characterization. If they still want to include a parent in Gen 2 for the tactical possibilities there are other options, like Edain, Briggid (as Eyvel?), maybe Lewyn, or a wild card like Beowolf or Arden. He and Lachesis platonically co-parent Leif and Nanna, and it’s her yearning for her son and the lost relationship with the father of her children that sees her leave them. In the Thracia remake Glade either experimented with Finn or was actively involved with him before he got married, hence Selphina’s prickliness. So as to avoid making Finn into a less morally ambiguous Dumbledore figure, he finds himself unexpectedly acting as a mentor to Diarmuid and possibly other non-straight kids in a way that can wink at contemporary gay culture without feeling completely out of place for the setting. He doesn’t get a tidy happy gay ending – save that for the second generation – but he gets to see his lover’s son grow up to fulfill his father’s grand dream and maybe at last finds some kind of closure.

Worst case scenario – Quan/Ethlin is a copy+paste of Clive/Mathilda and Quan dotes on his protégé without ever getting it. Finn can still be paired up, and it’s all as vague and unfulfilling as in the original games. Finn doesn’t even get someone like Python to speak frankly with, at best having a bland camaraderie with Glade in the Thracia remake. He doesn’t get to be any kind of mentor either since no one in Gen 2 is pointedly not into breeding anymore (because they turn Diarmuid into an Inigo clone or something, because he’s “charming”). The “canon” parentage of Lachesis’s children remains up in the air, such that Finn can’t even be reasonably excluded from the debate. Finn’s ending is just as weird and largely unexplained as ever.

Yeah…it’s far too early to say how the people behind the remakes will spin this. Fingers crossed?