imoooo its so stupit that the same ppl who complain abt the incest in genealogy which is, yknow, treated as taboo and terrible. are like “uwu my azurrin babies” and try to justify it by saying it doesnt count as incest bc it was a plot twist. like no. you’re just a hypocrite and don’t like games with good writing. genealogy has flaws, its a 20some year old game, but fates was poorly written and fanservicey and catered to incest fetishists lol and suckers like you still try to defend the plot as anything other than a cash grab off awakening’s success. lolz.
While I agree that there’s a lot of unnecessary hostilities between the different subsections of fandom and that criticisms of the games can be made in bad faith from preexisting biases against those groups (i.e. that Awakening and Fates represent newbies/casuals or that Genealogy, Blazing Sword, and/or the Tellius games are the ones most often exalted by older fans/elitists), the idea that Genealogy has a morally stronger position against incest than Fates or any other game for that matter is fundamentally flawed.
Sure, Arvis/Deirdre is explicitly a plot of the main antagonist…but of the numerous instances of unambiguous incestuous feeling in the Jugdral games this the only one condemned by the text, and arguably it’s more because Manfroy kidnapped and brainwashed Deirdre to make it happen than because he set her up to marry and sleep with her half-brother. The children of this pairing are practically demigods, and for Julius at least it is acknowledged in-game to be so because he is the product of incest. Then there’s Lachesis, whose powerful attachment to her brother is presented as a star-crossed love that can potentially get “fulfilled” if the player chooses to pair up Lachesis’s daughter and Eldigan’s son, who are fully aware of their parents’ unconventional attraction and lean into the implication in one of their conversations. That’s not even touching upon the other instances of potential incest the game allows for, among them an uncle and niece (Shannan/Larcei), two pairs of first cousins who could also be considered genetic half-siblings as their mothers are identical twins (Lester/Patty and Febail/Lana), two Gen 1 pairs ambiguously related through common holy blood (Ayra/Chulainn and Claud/Silvia), and possibly others depending in Gen 2 depending on who gets paired up in Gen 1 (ex. Lex!Larcei with Iuchar or Iucharba is another set of first cousins). The game does nothing to discourage any of these and could even be said to support these potential pairings as all of them have lover conversations, something that quite a few pairings in this game lack.
Overall I would say that FE4 takes a morally neutral stance against consensual incest, something that could be said for Fire Emblem as a whole and that crops up in smaller concentrations in most games. Fates may have a host of writing problems – I’m going over them again myself in a series I’m working through at the moment – but its stance on incest is entirely consistent with the rest of the series, from Lachesis’s tragic love to Priscilla’s clingy attachment to Raven to the twincest rumors of FE8 (freshly rekindled by Heroes, incidentally) to the bara bandit brothers in Awakening especially to, yes, Corrin’s ability to bone a whole host of people who are their siblings after a fashion. On that note though I do have to remark that Azurrin is not where you’ll find FE14′s incest fetishism. They’re only cousins – not considered incestuous in many cultures, including in Japan apparently since both Awakening and Fates include cousin pairings that are romantic in Japanese but clumsily censored to be platonic in localization – and are only revealed as such near the very end of what will probably be the last route the player experiences. It’s not something the story or their support dwell on either. No, the real incest fetishism comes from pairing Corrin with any of the Hoshidan or Nohrian royals, each of which plays up that angle for the benefit of those who are into that sort of thing.
And, for my part, I don’t consider that a problem. I’ve engaged in incest roleplay in my own sex life, and I don’t see anything morally objectionable about exploring the subject in fiction either. For better or worse incest is a recurring motif (or running gag, if you will) of Fire Emblem, and while we can speculate endlessly as to just why the series repeatedly feels the urge to go there it is something that fans either have to square with and accept or attempt to ignore. The individual games can be freely picked apart for their ethical and representational missteps – and old and new alike they all misstep in their own ways – but I would be very much surprised if there were ever an FE that took an all-around definitive stance against incest. Would it even really be FE then?